Holocaust Prosecution witness, American Professor, Christopher Browning, screaming down – in smoke & flames
March 21, 2022 in article about writing, Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles

Raul Hilberg refuses to appear again
March 20, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles
Raul Hilberg refuses to appear again
Chick-chick-chicken, SQUAWK!
For the second Ernst Zundel trail, Canada, 1988, our great Holocaust scholar, Professor
hold-my-beer Raul Hilberg, the world’s foremost Holocaust expert (according to the Jews), simply went down the white-feather poultry road. He refused to testify again.
He’d taken a lickin’ the first time (see: ), and he was damned if he’d risk another good hiding. Plus the acute risk of exposing himself to criminal perjury charges. newwritersharbor.com/members/francis_meyrick/
Robert Faurisson describes it thus:
“One misfortune awaited Prosecutor John Pearson: Raul Hilberg, in spite of repeated requests, refused to appear again. The defense, having heard rumors of an exchange of correspondence between Pearson and Hilberg, demanded and got the publication of the letters they exchanged and in particular of a “confidential” letter by Hilberg which did not hide the fact that he had some bitter memories of his cross-examination in 1985. He feared being questioned again by Douglas Christie on the same points. To quote the exact words of his confidential letter, Hilberg wrote that he feared “every attempt to entrap me by pointing out any seeming contradiction, however trivial the subject might be, between my earlier testimony and an answer that I might give in 1988.”
In fact as I have already mentioned, Hilberg had committed perjury and he may have feared being charged with that crime.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Source: page 25, downloaded from “Did six million really die?”
archive.org/details/DidSixMillionReallyDieRep
Note: he’s still holding his beer
Holocaust witness & ‘author’ Rudolf Vrba, crashing, in flames
March 20, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles


Holocaust survivor, Arnold Frieman, crashing, in flames
March 20, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles
Holocaust survivor, Arnold Frieman, crashing, in flames
I did a search on this Jewish liar, and I found this tear-jerker:
“I headed back home, trying to save my family, but heard they were deported to a place I later found out was the gas chambers of Auschwitz,” he said.
He was captured and placed in a forced labour camp.
“In the camp there was an ever-present threat of impending death,” Frieman told CBC Manitoba in 2011.
“You felt your life was worth less than, I don’t know, a dog’s, and the hopelessness and the evil that came from your supervisors, and every day there were less of us, less and less, and the writing was on the wall.”
However, he made what he called a “miraculous escape,” and after the war he was taken to Norway, where he studied electronics.
Source: cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/arnold-frieman-ob
Well, all was going well for him, until, I guess, he started believing his own lies. And agreed to serve as an expert witness in the 1985 Canadian Trial of Ernst Zundel. Big mistake. If you know you’re a fraud, the last thing you should do is expose yourself to cross examination. But that’s the pathology of the congenital l-i-a-r. They believe… their own lies.
Robert Faurisson documents the smoking wreckage as follows:
The prosecution counted on the testimony of “survivors.” These “survivors” were chosen with care. They were supposed to testify that they had seen, with their own eyes, preparations for and the carrying out of homicidal gassings. Since the war, in a series of trials like those at Nuremberg (1945-46), Jerusalem (1961), or Frankfurt (1963-65), such witnesses have never been lacking. However, as I have often noted, no lawyer for the defense had ever had the courage or the competence necessary to cross-examine these witnesses on the gassings themselves.
For the first time, in Toronto in 1985, one lawyer, Douglas Christie, dared to ask for explanations. He did it with the help of topographical maps and building plans as well as scholarly documentation on both the properties of the gases supposedly used and also on the capacities for cremation, whether carried out in crematory ovens or on pyres. Not one of these witnesses stood the test, and especially not Arnold Friedman. Despairing of his case, he ended by confessing that he had indeed been at Auschwitz-Birkenau (where he never had to work except once, unloading potatoes), but that, as regards gassings, he had relied on what others had told him.
+++++++++++++++++++
Fancy that. Verdict: Bullsh*t.
Reference: pages 18 through 19, downloaded from “Did six million really die?”
archive.org/details/DidSixMillionReallyDieRep
Raul Hilberg, world’s foremost Holocaust expert, and the day he crashed, in flames
March 19, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles
Raul Hilberg, world’s foremost Holocaust expert, and the day he crashed, in flames
I am frankly appalled at the sheer mendacity and astonishing nerve, of the so-called “world’s leading authority on the Holocaust”, Raul Hilberg. Still widely revered and feted in Jewish circles today, as the author of “The destruction of the European Jews.” American professor, Jewish descent. His appearance at the first Canadian trial of Ernst Zundel (1985) was such an anti-climactic farce, that most ordinary human beings would have been relived to slink away and hide. You would think. Well…
Consider the events at the trial:
1) (roll of the drums) (dramatic entry) (whispers in the audience) Enter Professor Raul Hilberg.
2) The professor gives a long and detailed testimony about what happened to the ‘six million Jews’. The terrible fate that befell them, the homicidal gas chambers, the sub-human cruelty of the Germans. Who would even dare question all that?
3) Douglas Christie, that’s who. Ernst Zundel’s lawyer.
In the words of Robert Faurisson, French scholar, who was beaten up (at an advanced age) no less than ten times by Jewish thugs.
“Right from the start it was clear that Hilberg, who was the world’s leading authority on the Holocaust, had never examined a single concentration camp, not even Auschwitz. He had still not examined any camp in 1985 when he announced the imminent appearance of a new edition of his main work in three volumes, revised, corrected and augmented. Although he did visit Auschwitz in 1979 for a single day as part of a ceremonial appearance, did not bother to examine either the buildings or the archives. In his entire life he has never seen a “gas chamber,” either in its original condition or in ruins. (For a historian, even ruins can tell tales). On the stand he was forced to admit that there had never been a plan, a central organization, a budget or supervision for what he called the policy of the extermination of the Jews. He also had to admit that since 1945 the Allies have never carried out an expert study of “the weapon of the crime,” that is to say of a homicidal gas chamber. No autopsy report has established that even one inmate was ever killed by poison gas.
Hilberg said that Hitler gave orders for the extermination of the Jews, and that Himmler gave an order to halt the extermination on November 25, 1944 (such detail!) But Hilberg could not produce these orders. The defense asked him if he still maintained the existence of the Hitler orders in the new edition of his book. He dared to answer yes. He thereby lied and even committed perjury. In the new edition of his work (with a preface dated September 1984), Hilberg systematically deleted any mention of an order by Hitler. [10] When he was asked by the defense to explain how the Germans had been able to carry out an undertaking as enormous as the extermination of millions of Jews without any kind of plan, without any central agency, without any blueprint or budget, Hilberg replied that in the various Nazi agencies there had been “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind-reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.”
Reference: pages 16 through 18, downloaded from “Did six million really die?”
https://archive.org/details/DidSixMillionReallyDieRepBarbaraKulaszka
10 Reasons the “Holocaust” never happened
March 15, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Investigation & Articles
I’m the first to admit I’m no expert on the topic but many of those, whom I’ve come to trust, are. During the last decade or so, after listening to many different people on the topic, I’ve come to believe the above statement that the “holocaust” never happened. The following are the 10 major reasons why I’ve changed my view on the topic. If you have proof that any of the following are wrong, please let me know in the comments.
10 Reasons the “Holocaust” Never Happened
- The World Almanac reported that the world’s Jewish population was slightly larger just after the war than it was just before the war
- No Bodies: Nobody ever found anywhere near six million bodies
- No Gas Chambers: Nobody ever found a single gas chamber capable of killing humans, never-mind six million of them
- No Crematoria: Nobody ever found crematoria capable of incinerating six million bodies
- No Written Orders were ever discovered ordering the deaths of Jews
- No Mention of a “Holocaust” in historical works like Churchill’s six-volume history of the war, The Second World War
- Camp Workers and Residents living near the camps can not recall anyone going missing
- Red Cross Representatives Were Stationed in the Camps and none ever reported a “holocaust”
- Jewish Elites Have Repeatedly Cried “Six Million”: After nearly every major European conflict of the 19th and 20th centuries, Jews cried “holocaust”
- Six Million is the Number of Jews That Were Transported to the Camps, yet the camps were full at the end of the war
Notes on the above
1. The World Almanac Reports: The World Almanac reported that there were roughly 15.3 million Jews in the world in 1933 when Judea famously declared war on Germany and a little under 15.8 million in 1948, just after the war. According to most sources, there are still roughly 15-18 million Jews in the world. And that number has held steady for over a century.
2. No Bodies: No where near six million bodies were ever found. They say this is because they were burned in pits. Crematorium owners and other experts on the subject assure us that it is impossible to burn a human body to ash without specially designed incinerators. Even garbage incinerators won’t do it.
You’ve probably seen the photos of emaciated bodies piled high in huge mounds. Turns-out, none of those photos have ever been authenticated and are probably pictures from the Soviet camps (gulags and others) where mass murders did take place. All of the authentic photos of the Jewish camps show relatively healthy well-fed inmates.
3. No Gas Chambers: Although there were gas chambers at the camps, none capable of killing humans en masse has ever been found. The chambers found in the camps today were used for delousing the prisoners clothing and bedding. No one disputes this nor does anyone claim they were used for gassing people. Further, the Zyklon B supply was exhausted circa 1942-3 after which time most of the gassings were reported to have occurred. The Germans switched to steam for delousing purposes. Another important question: if they were in the camps to be exterminated why were the Germans so interested in their comfort and routinely delousing their clothing and bedding?
No Jews were injured during the gassing of their clothes
Ed: See also: “The Western Allies never found any homicidal gas chambers”
4. No Crematoria: There were crematoria in at least one of the camps, and they were used for cremating bodies — people did die in the camps from accidents, natural causes, and diseases like typhus and it was dangerous to bury them in camps that had high water tables, so they were cremated instead.
ED: Put it this way: there were absolutely no ‘homicidal gas chambers disguised as shower rooms’. That’s their whole tear-jerker. And yes, Auschwitz had a water table as high as only eighteen inches below the surface. Which, incidentally, makes the lurid stories about open-air, burning, massive, deep, funeral pyres, um, problematical, to say the least.
5. No Written Order: No shred of a paper trail has ever been found. Given that the Reich was notoriously assiduous in matters of record-keeping and recorded every order in triplicate it’s hard to believe that something so important was accomplished with zero paperwork. Eventually, a document was submitted purporting to be proof of a written order but it was quickly dismissed as a Soviet forgery. Apparently, it was written with German vocabulary — but Russian grammar and syntax.
6. No Mention of a “Holocaust” in Historical Works. Winston Churchill authored a roughly 4,500 page, six-volume history of World War II called The Second World War — he never mentions a deliberate attempt to exterminate Jews. Other men who played a major role in World War Two, like Dwight Eisenhower and Charles de Gaulle, never mentioned a “holocaust” of Jews in their memoirs. In fact, the term didn’t even come into vogue until Kurt Vonnegut coined the term in his 1969 novel Slaughterhouse Five. He, of course, was writing about the very real holocaust (Greek for “burnt offering”) of civilians in the allied firebombing of Dresden.
7. Camp Workers and Residents around the camp don’t recall a “holocaust”. Although we’ve all heard the stories from Jews of having their friends and relatives killed before their eyes or having narrowly escaped death themselves, few, if any, non-Jews have ever corroborated these tales. As I understand, the Nuremberg Trials of “war criminials” used the same small number of Jewish “witnesses” for every case.
8. Red Cross Representatives Were Stationed in the Camps and None Ever Reported Malfeasance. Further, at the insistence of the Germans, the Red Cross often sent teams in to inspect the camps and they routinely reported that there were no violations of the early Geneva Conventions. As a side note, there is an apocryphal report floating around the web which states that roughly 275,000 Jews died in the camps, most toward the end of the war when typhus hit central Europe hard. Others, of course, died from natural causes.
9. Several times over the centuries Jewish Elites Have Cried Six Million in order to fleece their flock. Including a famous declaration of a holocaust after the First World War.
10. Six Million Jews Were Transported to the Camps, yet the camps were full at the end of the war. This one is self-evident, if six million were interned and they were all more or less present at the end of the war (except for the natural number of deaths in a population that size over six years) then how can one accept the claim of six million dead.
Conclusion
Given the above, why does the establishment inundate us with the “holocaust” narrative? The answer is simple. The Western establishment is dominated by a relatively small handful of Jewish Oligarchs who are trying to destroy all opposition to the Jew World Order. The “holocaust” narrative is intended to induce guilt in Whites in an effort to prevent us from resisting Jewish Rule.
For those interested in learning more, see the Colchester Collection’s short (but growing) list of books on the subject of the “Holocaust”.
Also, I recommend Fredrick Toben’s excellent documentary, which gives a more thorough treatment of the topic: Judea Declares War on Germany
(Editor’s note: This entry was originally published in March 2017. It was revised and updated in February of 2019, and again in November of 2021.)
________________
This article is copyright 2009, 2019, 2021 and licensed under the Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 International License. You are free to republish verbatim copies of it (in whole or in part) in any form (hard copy, digital, etc.) as long as you provide proper attribution. Click on the link above for complete license terms.
The Night is dark, the Seas, stormy
March 8, 2022 in article about writing
The Night is dark, the seas, stormy
Who even thinks like this Rabbi? Never mind coming out, and flat-out saying it?
We are all here for a tiny wander. A taster. That’s all.
Then, with a soft sigh? We are gone.
To seek only power, and wealth, and status in this little Life? Obsessively, maniacally, so?
It’s like sailing your ship, at night, through fog, and torrential rain, past hidden ice bergs, and uncharted reefs. Posing, strutting, preening. Your chest all puffed out.
Loudly proclaiming:
“Full speed ahead! We are the highest and most cultured!”
With the plastic lens caps still on your binoculars. You can’t see anything. You’re sailing blind.
The wiser captain slows down.
Peering intently through his binoculars, hour after hour, through the darkness.
The windscreen wipers clacking time.
Rain running down the windows.
His heart? Humble. In love with the seas. His feet, sturdily braced, against the rhythm of Life.
Deeply, deeply, respectful, of that which he barely discerns…
Twenty-two Questions for the honest man
February 27, 2022 in Holocaust Stories, Normie Challenge List
“In the privacy, of your own mind? What do you think, of human kind?
When it comes to truth or lies? Which is written, in the skies?”
Question #1.
Why did Elie Wiesel and countless (tens of thousands?) (nope!) (100,000 plus??) of other Jews survive the Holocaust (and go on to collect fame & reparations), if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew they got their hands on? Wiesel claimed (disputed – Ed) to have been an inmate at Auschwitz for several YEARS. Others claim to have survived even longer. Most of these “survivors” were ordinary people, who did not possess any unique expertise. That could have been uniquely exploited for the German war effort. There was no logical, pressing reason to keep them alive. The very existence of more than a million survivors, even today, sixty years later (written AD 2005 – Ed), flat-out, laughably, contradicts one of the basic alleged components of the Holocaust. Namely that the Germans were inhumane, murderous brutes, determined to kill each and every hapless Jew they could get their claws on.
Question #2
Why is there no mention of the Holocaust, in Winston Churchill’s 6-volume History of the Second World War? And no mention in Charles de Gaulle’s war time memoirs? Or in the memoirs of a host of lesser luminaries, who wrote about the Second World War? Keep in mind that all these lengthy tomes were written years after the war had ended. And thus AFTER the Holocaust had allegedly been convincingly proven at the marathon Nuremburg Trails? SO convincingly, without any reasonable doubt, in fact, that men were HUNG for their alleged war crimes? The silence of these initiates, these experts, is strange. To say the least. Some might say, deafening.
Question #3
What was an inmate hospital doing in Auschwitz, well documented? If it was, in fact, a murderous death camp, run by vicious German thugs? Excuse me, but do you cure ’em before you gas ’em? Oh, and why was there a Post Office? A swimming pool? Sports field? Concerts? A theater, putting on Plays? That the murderous German brutes attended? And we won’t mention the surviving film footage showing these activities. And we definitely (heaven forbid!) won’t mention a certain location that did a peachy fine business.The camp BROTHEL.
Question #4
Why would the Germans round up the Jews from far flung corners of their ever sprawling Reich? Thereby tying up large numbers of personnel, and high-in-demand railway resources? While fighting a World War on two fronts? All this major effort to deliver people to homicidal death camps, hundreds of miles away? Where (according to tearful, Holocaust Museum grade, ‘First Person’ Survivor stories) they were promptly executed upon arrival? Wouldn’t a five cent bullet-on-the-spot have saved a bunch of needless trouble and expense?
Question #5
Why after all this time, have Historians and researchers, gold-diggers and fakers, not been able to come up with a single verifiable, authentic German document, or written orders, that PROVE the Holocaust was a deliberate policy? Should we believe the likes of Raoul Hilberg, who claimed that in the place of German written orders, there came about “an incredible Meeting of the Minds”? Among the literally TENS of THOUSANDS of Germans, who would have had to smoothly coordinate their actions, over vast distances, and extended time periods, in order to carry out an epic undertaking of this magnitude?
Question #6
How come it is still insisted upon, on penalty of prison & infamy in many countries, that SIX MILLION JEWS were murdered? When, (hang ON here a cotton pickin’ second), the official death toll at Auschwitz (the flag ship of the Holocaust) started out at FOUR MILLION, just after the war. See photo of that monument. Then, under massive pressure from Revisionist Historians, was reduced to “approx 1.5 million”, in 2008. Overnight, with no publicity. See photo of that later monument. And THEN, blow me down, was reduced to “less than one million”. But the TOTAL is still SIX MILLION?? How does that even WORK? What kind of amazing abacus do you use, to perform that feat of advanced Mathematics? And to come along, all hoity-toity and indignant, stamping your Jewish foot, shouting “What difference does it make, six million murdered Jews or one million murdered Jews?”, comes across as some epic blustering. Many revisionist Historians don’t even accept one million DEATHS (no where near it, in fact) (not: murders). The fact is you weepy Holocaust faithful, full of emotion and rage at the Germans, are already, on your own admission, FIVE MILLION JEWS out. On your super special abacus. How can we attach much credence to ANYTHING you say, after that? And yet, you send people to jail, for three years, for even daring to ask these BASIC QUESTIONS? Like David Irving, the Historian? Will you persecute us, if we pass you a calculator, instead of your magic abacus?
Question #7
All of Germany’s war time codes were compromised. The Bletchley decrypts meant that the British code breakers were listening in, in real time, to everything the Germans were saying. That treasure trove of information critically includes the daily reports sent from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make NO MENTION of mas executions. Those messages don’t even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. It has been suggested the Germans used some sort of code words, to describe their mass murders. The evidence is scant, to say the least. Since high-level, critical German military communications were passed over such decoded channels, with the British listening in, it seems obvious that the Germans had no clue that their code had been compromised.
Question #8
The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere eighteen inches beneath the surface. Which makes the lurid claims of huge, deep pits, full of tens of thousands of burning bodies, wholly untenable. In addition, regular Allied camera overflights failed to capture one single image supporting this claimed, massive barbecue. Further evidence clearly refuting these lies, is provided by the massive quantities of coke that would have been required. But never provided.
Question #9
Initially, strident claims were made that mass executions, in ‘homicidal gas chambers’ (disguised as shower rooms), had taken place in many of the camps liberated by the Western Allies. The US, Britain and France. These Western Allies liberated most of the land mass of the old German Reich, and most of the concentration camps. Investigation, however, produced NO evidence of this. During the nineteen-sixties, amazingly (and some would say, conveniently) that story completely changed. Now it was held that all the German homicidal death camps were in fact all liberated by the advancing Russians. Fancy that. So we are asked to solemnly believe that all the Death camps were located, amazingly, ONLY in that area under Russian occupation, and away from prying, investigative, allied eyes. The honest Bolshevik Russians, of course, pure as the driven snow, with nothing themselves to hide, (no Russian gulags or anything like that, a genocide here and a mass, forced starvation maybe there), can be totally relied upon to be telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. About the terrible German homicidal gas chambers. Disguised as shower rooms. Found, amazingly, ONLY. In their area.
Question #10
Nobody has been able to reconcile the many, many, super emotional, ‘eye witness’ accounts, that slave worker personnel entered the gas chambers after only twenty minutes. Without any protective gear. Given the minor fact, that Zyklon-B was a ‘time release’ fumigant, that would have had an absolutely lethal capability for at least another twenty four hours. And that even after twenty-four hours, the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated with the hydrogen cyanide gas, to provide a massive, lethal risk to said personnel. Capable of killing those who even touched the bodies. Yet, we have masses of ‘eye witness’ testimony, of Jewish people claiming tearfully, with full televised pathos and obligatory choked-up emotion, that they did in fact, perform the scientifically impossible.
Question #11
Why do we no longer hear the solemn Nuremburg claims (for which people were hung by the neck) that those evil Germans manufactured soap, lamp shades, riding britches out of those poor, poor Jews? Although, I recently watched yet another extremely dubious, borderline laughable video, carefully stage managed by the well-funded US Holocaust Museum. In it the sprightly looking ‘survivor’ appears to imply they were forced to wash themselves with soap that they knew was made from murdered Jews. Oh, how terrible! And she spoke her lines so well! With such a straight face! But these stories, although not completely dead and buried, are on the wane. Could it be that in the light of modern forensics, and DNA knowledge, these off-the-wall claims, faithfully parroted by teeming legions of ‘Holocaust survivor’ Jews, serve more to prove the worst form of mass tribal, congenital mendacity? A vicious slur against the German people?
Question #12
Why do we no longer hear shrill claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers? Electrocuted on special grids? Diesel-fumed to death? Oh, and attacked, ripped apart, by wild beasts, eagles and bears? Oh, and the masturbation machines? Let’s not forget them. It added color to the Nuremburg trials. All accepted as solemn fact, eh? Men were hung by the neck on account of all this. But the suggestion of lies, cruel lies, and damnable lies, on the part of the 2,400 Jewish, Nuremburg court appointees, flown in from all over the world? That would provoke outrage, even today. In Europe, one dare not breath a whisper. On pain of lengthy incarceration. Or a good rub-a-dub beating, from a brave gang of a dozen Jewish thugs. Like the TEN times, that Robert Faurisson got beaten to pulp. In America? A matter of time, before the gag becomes felony law, it appears. Judging by our Governors, like ‘Knee Jerk’ Greg Abbot of Texas, and the Khazar-appointed popular hero from Florida, Ron de Santis. The eagles, bears, and masturbation machines are accepted in the Nuremburg documents. Justice was rendered. Query it at your goyim peril.
Question #13
Do we seriously believe that nobody ever suffered like the Jews? That their suffering is unique in the annals of Human History? That this ‘fact’ must be relentlessly drummed into our school children, through the method of mandatory school courses? Holocaust only, of course, with no mention of the Jew-masterminded Bolshevik massacres? The murder of priests, nuns, bishops, mayors, writers, artists, engineers, business leaders and intelligentsia? The fate of the ethnically cleansed Kulaks? The Armenian genocide? Courtesy of the Donmeh, the Turkish crypto Jews? The Holodomor? All of which numbers FAR exceed even the mythical ‘six million Jews’? Massively so? Yes, we must seriously believe that. We are anti-Semitic, unless we solemnly believe that nobody, ever, in the History of the World, EVER, suffered, like the poor Jews.
Question #14
Elie Wiesel has been described as the ‘Apostle of Remembrance’. His book ‘Night’ is mandatory reading at Americans schools. Millions sold. Every literary reward bestowed. But, hold on. How come his Concentration camp tattoo belongs to another prisoner? How come it appears and disappears? How come many claim he was never there, at all, and outrageously faked the whole sorry story? How come in his world-famous “Night”, in which he describes his stay at Auschwitz, he (Oops!) forgets to mention the ‘homicidal gas chambers’? Disguised as shower rooms? With drafty, wooden doors, handle on the inside, and large, single pane windows? Isn’t that a bit like one of the Gospels, accidentally forgetting to mention Jesus? Or the Cross?
Question #15
How come just about every survivor of Auschwitz, featured in the tearful US Holocaust Museum ‘First Person’ survivor stories, was personally examined, fondled, experimented upon, chosen, selected, by Dr Mengele? But they all managed, somehow, miraculously to survive? And not get their hands swapped across, for fun? Or boiled or frozen alive? Was this man capable of personally dealing with tens of thousands of Jews? How busy was he? Is the Dr Mengele line remotely true? Or just an expected, obligatory prop? Like being forced to wash your hands in soap, made from murdered Jews?
Question #16
According to survivor Jews, hundreds of thousands of their people were executed at Treblinka. And then buried in mind-bogglingly HUGE mass graves, in the adjacent area. Those who solemnly swore the sacred truth of their stories, could not have foreseen (Oops!) the later invention and emergence, of more and technologically advanced, ground sonar probing equipment. (In the same vein that later DNA testing, and pesky forensic methods could not have been foreseen, by the enthusiastic creators of the shrunken heads & the human skin lampshades). How is it that extensive sonar probing of these supposed mass burial grounds, has clearly revealed that this alleged ‘final resting place’, for tens of thousands of Jewish Holocaust victims? Has remained undisturbed for quite a while. To be precise, since the last flippin’ ICE AGE.
Question #17
“Proof” of the Holocaust rests primarily on survivor testimony. There is little, if any, hard evidence. Even the best of this ‘evidence’ has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as ‘merely criminal traces’. Even Judge Grey, who presided at the Irving/Lipstadt trial, commented that he was surprised that the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was “extremely thin”. To paraphrase Arthur Butz: ” A crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence.” Yo! Where IS it? There was much more hard evidence at the OJ Simpson trial, and he was found innocent. So much of the ‘survivor testimony’ is thought to be actually nothing more than ‘hearsay evidence’, which is notoriously unreliable. And in essence, inadmissible in respectable court. That may even be kind. Not only may there be much ‘hearsay evidence’ in play here. That is to say nothing about outright malicious fabrication.
Question #18
Why has Holocaust Revisionism been so viciously criminalized in so many countries? What other supposedly self-evident truth, needs to be protected/defended by the threat of lengthy prison sentences? The systematic destruction of a man’s career? Punitive and predatory legal sanctions? Bailiffs rolling up to take your furniture? When a Judge dismisses verifiable, Historical truth as irrelevant, because, he says “The Truth is no defense”, then are there any greater heights of woof-woof, barking, Clown World left to ascend? We can criticize Jesus, and make movies alleging his homosexuality, grant him purple hair, and allow him to cavort with Mary Magdalene. Not a problem. Barely an eyebrow raised anymore. But if you DARE to ask even basic questions about the ‘6 million Jews’? Oh, my.
Question #19
Why do Holocaust defenders quickly resort to furious anger, and heated emotion, even threats of physical violence? Why can’t they stay with the Historical facts? Are they secretly hiding their weakness, in regards to those pesky Historical facts? They say that denying the Holocaust is outrageous, like denying slavery, or claiming that the earth is flat. In doing so they casually ignore what they full well know to be true: that they are up against life long, career Historians, often with outstanding academic credentials. Those same Holocaust defenders also claim denying the Holocaust, even basic-questioning it, is indecent, immoral, a crime against humanity. There exists no other Historical event, or alleged historical event, which is supposedly off-limits to Historical scrutiny. ONLY the Holocaust Brigade make this unique claim.
Question #20
The Holocaust reparations paid by Germany, and other countries, to the Jews, now amount to hundreds of billions of dollars. Does anybody reasonably suppose that this colossal sum of money is NOT a factor in the fury with which the Jewish lobby defend the ‘6 million Jews’ story? Does anybody, with a straight face, propose to stand up and say that the small matter of reparations has nothing what-so-ever to do with the hair-trigger, teeth-bared, throat snarling, ever-ready defense of the ‘6 million’?
Question #21
Survivors of the Holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the chimneys of the crematoria, as the flames consumed the bodies of the murdered Jews. Some eye witnesses even solemnly claimed that they could detect national origins from the color of the smoke. Experts in the technology of highly modern, state-of-the-art crematorium ovens have testified that today’s technology is wholly unable to come even remotely close to the -claimed- efficiency of the German World War Two era ovens.
Question #22
The International Red Cross was granted access to all Hitler’s work camps. They have documented that they saw no evidence of homicidal, or genocidal extermination taking place. Israel is known to have exerted tremendous political pressure on the International Red Cross, to remain silent. One wonders why.
The hypocrisy of ‘Black Lives Matter’
July 12, 2016 in Uncategorized
(Background: I have been doing some writing for a website called ‘Quora’. I’ve written just over 100 answers to questions asked by Internet users. This response I wrote had garnered well over 20,000 views and 130 upvotes in a 24 hour period. But once again, their moderator team abruptly censored my writing, and collapsed my answer. I have been repeatedly harassed and threatened by one or more of their ‘moderators’ with permanent banishment from their site. I think the issue is that some of their mods have extreme views of their own, which they like to impose. They also may not be very sophisticated or educated readers. Meaning that they fail to understand that a writer will hold up something very ugly to the light, before he analyzes it, and offers an alternative viewpoint. Endless snarky messages to ‘be nice, be respectful’ show me that they do not understand this very common literary device. I have decided there is not much point continuing there. I will transfer those posts to this site, and forget about ‘Quora’ as a serious outlet.)
I sigh. Deeply. There is no easy way of saying what I feel. Here goes my best effort:
Why do Movements like BLM refuse to acknowledge that Black-on-White crime is MASSIVELY higher than White-on-Black?
There are several reasons:
BLM exhibits, in copious quantities:
1. Moral cowardice & opportunism
2. Overwhelming self pity
3. a tradition of shallow intellectual reasoning
4. Screaming, classic, text book, pathological racism
For all those reasons, they are PART OF THE PROBLEM.
The line of reasoning that wants to neatly (and conveniently) separate soaring Black criminality out from their ‘movement’ is patently false, absurd, and does not for one second stand up to scrutiny. It’s so thin, you can not only see through it, if you hold it up to the light, it spontaneously combusts.
FACT: Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks commit around half of homicides in the United States. DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, blacks committed 52% of homicides, compared to 45% of homicides committed by whites. More up to date FBI statistics tell a similar story.
Now, the last thing we need to do is tar all Muslims with the same brush. I argue elsewhere on Quora that to do so, is a massive own goal. We need the Modernist, reformist, Law Abiding Compassionate Muslims to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with us, to defeat the brainwashed 7th century cult groupies. And usher them into the 21st century, or smack ’em down – hard. The percentage of Muslims who exhibit some degree of Radicalism and/or support for Shariah Law -which has NO PLACE in America, ever- is distressing, but it still should not deflect us from a resolve to warmly welcome those into our homes, who wish to be part of the fabric of Modern America. The last thing we need to do, is persecute and vilify ALL MUSLIMS, and drive them, by our bigotry and crass prejudice, straight into the arms of the fiendishly grinning crazy extremists.
Well, for the label “Muslims’ please substitute the word ‘Black’ in the above paragraph. And you will see pretty well the exact same imperative, minus the 7th century bit:
give your black (or white) (or brown) neighbor a hug today.
Hey, I’ve got black friends. I’ve worked with black buddies flying and maintaining helicopters, around the world. We’ve laughed our a**ses of together, and we’ve gotten drunk together. On occasions, when stunning tragedy struck, we have wordlessly hugged one another. There’s not a job on this planet, that a Black Man hasn’t demonstrated he can do equally well as the White Man, the Brown Man, the Yellow Man, and the vast ranges of superficial skin pigmentation in between. One of my best buds was a Chinaman. A heart of gold. Despite all the drama and the hoopla, the lurid headlines and the blood needlessly spilled on the streets, we are still all ONE HUMAN FAMILY. The vast majority of us, white, black, yellow, red, brown, white-black, brown-yellow, yellow-red, we ALL just want to walk down the street safely. See our kids safe at school. Pay the mortgage. Drive a decent car. Get promoted. Get along with our neighbors. See the Packers get clobbered.
The vast, overwhelming majority of ANY RACE just wants it all to go away. They don’t want drug infested neighborhoods, street muggings, and crime statistics that blight their lives. How many of us are staring at the news, shaking our heads sadly, wishing we could wind the clock back a few days?
I believe that Cops are held to a very, very high standard in this great country. I KNOW it. I’ve travelled and worked around the world, and I could tell a tale or two about the way the REST of the world’s cops behave! Put it this way, when the nice man at Immigration at Houston handed me back my passport, and said “Welcome home, Sir!” (as they did, reliably, once a month, every time I flew back in from Angola and the Congo) I felt this warm glow of happiness. And relief. Glad to be back in America. Land of Opportunity. Home. You want to appreciate THIS COUNTRY? Speaking as an immigrant, and a very proud US Citizen, I say to you:
“Travel around the world. Open your eyes. Don’t EVER take what you have here for granted! America is GREAT. Roll your sleeves up, and get going. ANYBODY can make it here.”
Are there problems? F**k, yes. Everywhere. Are the cops perfect? No. You get the odd character who just shouldn’t be behind a badge. Who can show me ANY profession that doesn’t have the odd fruitcake? But the overwhelming majority, the screaming overwhelming majority, consist of the type of cop YOU AND ME WANT TO SHOW UP ON OUR DOOR STEPS when some knife or gun wielding maniac, possibly high on God-knows-what-poison, comes ah-kicking and ah-screaming in our back door.
The problem is still a MINORITY. That includes shallow, intellectually severely challenged, hate spewing BLM hotheads. I have no time for them. I was also impressed (saddened) by Richard Warner’s sobering research, under this same question.
Let’s gather together, as one family, and make a point of not letting the haters win.
give your black (or white) (or brown) neighbor a hug today.
And let’s all just get along.
I’m going to down to the Dollar store to buy a pint of milk. That big black Mama will probably be there. Always gives me that huge big welcoming smile. A real sweetheart. Funny as well. Always good for a chat. I’m looking forward to that.
When I drive across the car park, I’m gonna be extra courteous to everybody. I’m gonna stop for pedestrians, and cheerfully wave them on.
I’m going to make an extra effort today, by my words and actions, to be part of the solution, not the problem. I’m going to weigh my words more carefully. I’m not going to whitewash what I think, in the words of George Carlin, is plain
BULLSHIT
…but I’m also going to be a lover.
Sincerely,
Moggy
An Ode to Erdogan
April 14, 2016 in Poetry
Right where my feelings proudly start
Behind the smug and well fed jowl
Right where my lust and ego prowl
That’s where you’ll find a burning hate
That wishes to wipe clean the slate
There never was a genocide
Armenians? They all just lied,
The Kurds I always warmly hugged
My deepest love, my heart strings tugged,
Adoring Christians all around
No greater joy for me the sound
Of singing faithful at their prayer
I love to hear it everywhere.
I fight the ISIL state with zeal
I’d never do some secret deal.
The Sukhoi got his just deserts
I’m sorry if the truth just hurts
With Nato firmly by my side
I poked the Bear right in his hide
Democracy etched in my soul
And tolerance my sacred goal
Together with my Merkel lass
You all can kiss my Muslim ass.
Last edited by Francis Meyrick on April 14, 2016, 10:26 am