whadmin

Main Index – Click HERE

17. Holocaust Denial Laws, and persecution for…. the asking of BASIC Questions??

‘Cigpapers’ wrote:

In most parts of Europe questioning any aspect of the findings of the Nuremberg Trials is a very serious criminal offence on par with rape, murder or armed robbery. In France you can receive up to 20 years in prison, which may have to be served in solitary confinement. Even where it is not illegal questioning the official Holocaust narrative will probably cost you your job, family, house etc.

Despite this a lot of top writers, academics, historians and scientists have questioned the official Holocaust narrative or denied it entirely. Professor Ernst Zundel was put on numerous trials around the World, had his house firebombed, received death threats, his family broke up, was deported from several countries and eventually was imprisoned for five years in Germany. No other historical event can attract this type of punishment for questioning the official narrative.

Despite these threats, the official narrative is constantly exposed as being a lie and the Jews have to constantly change their claims when faced with irrefutable evidence of their lies.

Source: https://cigpapers.blog/2013/11/16/holocaust-or-holohoax-21-amazing-facts/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The treatment of Holocaust ‘Basic Questioners’ is bad enough. The treatment meted out to outright ‘Deniers’ is off the charts. The more I’ve seen how such polite, composed, highly educated, genteel type folk have been treated?  In Ku-Ku-Kangaroo Courts? Come ON.
What a dead give-away.
Paraphrased:

“We Jews, (and our wonderful Zionist friends & collaborators), are SO cocksure of the undeniable TRUTH of what we are maintaining, that we are ABSOLUTELY forbidding you, under penalty of unspeakable horrors, of asking even the most BASIC Questions…!”

Does that make sense to you?

“We Jews, (and our…etc, etc), are hereby informing you the Holocaust is a Historical Fact. And as such, no discussion of it is permissible. Other than to totally agree with everything WE say about it.”

Huh?

“We Jews, (and our…etc, etc), wish to point out that one of the highest German Courts has recently declared, that (literally) “the TRUTH is no defense”.

Double huh?

This is total logical gobbledygook. What OTHER rah-rah-rah ‘Historical Fact’ is out there that we can NOT openly discuss, dissect, examine under different light, is open to revision, re-interpretation, and wide-ranging critique? Including the life and times of Jesus??
None, to my knowledge.

If anything, this is a magnificent Talmudic own goal.
It comes not so much across as:
“The Holocaust is a Historical Fact”, as more:  “The cheese of the  Holocaust myth is full of  holes.”

It comes not so much across as:
“The TRUTH is no defense – end of discussion”, as more:  “WHY do you want to strangle the discussion?? What are you HIDING?”
“What are you so fearful of?”

Ursula Haverbeck in the interviews I have watched, comes across as balanced, reasonable, well informed, articulate, and honest. Her arch nemesis, Charlotte Knobloch, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, the driving force behind Haverbeck’s persecution, comes across as astonishingly bitter, and endlessly vindictive.
Here’s Ursula, and what you see is what you get:  Grandma, who was around at the time this stuff was hitting the fun fan in Germany. Who might just know a thing or two. Or twenty.

Here’s Knobloch, oozing the unassailable integrity of the ‘Historical Fact’ out of every pore:

Which one do you trust more?

It’s nuts. Clown world.

This is just an overview of the fate of leading Holocaust Revisionists. And the utter, barking, woof-woof, screaming non-logic that cockily tries to pass itself off as the epitome of Jurisprudence, Ethics, and the Jews’ view of (cough) World Wide Decency.

I have a lot more to write, in due course, about the work of individual Revisionists.

Return to Index? (Holocaust Normie Challenge List)?

Last edited by Francis Meyrick on March 28, 2021, 11:56 am